Stockle - the stock oracle

EPL OIL & GAS, INC.

US:EPL
No current share price held for this company.

Past year: ▲ 29%(26.87 – 39.14 USD)

Market cap
—
Shares on issue
—
Story beats
62 since 2005
Last event
15 Mar 2016

History

A Gulf of Mexico oil producer that borrowed to grow, failed in a 2009 bankruptcy, rebuilt through acquisitions, sold to Energy XXI in 2014, then defaulted on its bonds in 2016.

2005-2006: Borrowed money and a bid too big

Energy Partners, Ltd. was a New Orleans oil and gas producer working the shallow waters of the Gulf of Mexico and onshore south Louisiana. In January 2005 it closed its first large purchase, paying about $146 million cash for south Louisiana properties from the Castex group, partly by drawing $60 million on its bank revolver. In June 2006 it enlarged that bank facility from $200 million to $300 million, and days later it signed a deal to buy Stone Energy at $51.00 a share, after Stone's board judged the offer better than Stone's existing deal with Plains Exploration & Production. The price, about $2.1 billion including Stone's debt, would have roughly doubled the company.

It did not last. In late August 2006 ATS Inc., a Woodside Petroleum vehicle, sued in Delaware over the termination fees and launched a hostile $23.00 a share tender offer. The board adopted a rights plan, a poison pill, against it. On 11 October 2006 the board ended the Stone merger, paying Stone $8 million and writing off $44.5 million of costs, including the $43.5 million it had paid Plains to break Stone's earlier deal. About $52 million was spent and nothing acquired. The board then opened a search for strategic alternatives, including a possible sale. ATS dropped its lawsuit, and its offer expired on 17 November 2006 with no shares taken. The record does not say how ATS's attempt to replace the board ended, and names no buyer in the sale process.

2007-2008: The leveraged buyback

Having failed to buy, the company chose to shrink its equity instead. In March 2007 Bank of America committed to finance a recapitalisation, and in April the company issued $300 million of 9.75% notes due 2014 and $150 million of floating-rate notes, alongside a new secured credit agreement. It drew $70 million to pay for shares bought in a self-tender of up to $200 million. In June it sold substantially all its onshore south Louisiana assets back to Castex Energy 2007 for $71.7 million, a fraction of what it had paid two years earlier, and used the money to pay down the revolver. In April 2008 activist holder Carlson Capital, with about 9.4%, placed three directors on the board.

2009: Chapter 11

The debt proved too heavy. In March 2009 the offshore regulator issued a non-compliance notice over $16.7 million of unposted bonds for well plugging and platform removal. In April a cut to the borrowing base left a $38 million shortfall the company could not repay. Its banks granted extensions and agreed to hold off on defaults, but on 1 May 2009 Energy Partners filed for Chapter 11 in Houston with its noteholders' support agreement already signed.

The plan was confirmed on 3 August and took effect on 21 September 2009. Noteholders received 95% of the new equity (38 million shares) and existing shareholders 5% (2 million shares). The old notes and equity plans were cancelled. New money came from a GE Capital facility and $61.1 million of 20% pay-in-kind second-lien notes taken by Carlson Capital, Wexford and others. Founder Richard Bachmann was replaced as chief executive by Gary Hanna the same day.

2010-2012: Rebuilding by acquisition

The punitive notes were redeemed in full by mid-2010, after the GE facility was reset, and PricewaterhouseCoopers replaced KPMG as auditor. Then the company began buying again. In February 2011 it paid $200.7 million for Anglo-Suisse Gulf of Mexico assets, funded by $210 million of 8.25% notes due 2018. In November 2011 an $80 million agreement for Main Pass interests from Stone Energy Offshore closed at only $38.4 million after an Apache subsidiary exercised pre-emption rights. In May 2012 it paid $32.4 million for W&T Offshore's 40% of South Timbalier 41, taking full ownership.

Renamed EPL Oil & Gas in 2012, it agreed in September to buy Hilcorp's Gulf of Mexico shelf subsidiary for $550 million, about 10,000 barrels a day. A further $300 million of 8.25% notes and an enlarged secured facility of up to $750 million paid for it, and it closed in November. Share count stayed near 39 to 40 million throughout, as growth was funded by debt rather than new shares.

2013-2014: Sale to Energy XXI

The record for 2013 is quiet. In January 2014 EPL bought Nexen's Eugene Island 258/259 field for $70.4 million. In March it agreed to be bought by Energy XXI: holders could elect $39.00 cash, 1.669 Energy XXI shares, or a mix, prorated to about 65% cash and 35% shares. A joint proxy statement followed on 21 April 2014, with former EPL holders to own about 25% of Energy XXI. The merger completed on 3 June 2014, making EPL an indirect wholly owned subsidiary and replacing its board and officers.

2014-2016: Inside the parent's troubles

EPL kept filing as a subsidiary. It bought South Pass 49 interests from a sister company for about $230 million, repaid its $475 million facility and joined the parent's first-lien loan. The group breached its leverage covenant, at 3.6 times against a 3.5 limit. In March 2015 EPL signed a $325 million 10% second-lien note to its parent, funded by the parent's $1.45 billion of 11% secured notes. In September 2015 it said accounts from June 2014 to March 2015 needed restating because its hedging paperwork fell short of the required standard.

On 15 February 2016 EPL missed interest on its 8.25% 2018 notes. Bank lenders waived the default only in short steps, and by 15 March 2016 the waiver ran to 15 April and also covered missed interest on the parent's 6.875% 2024 and 11% 2020 notes. That was the last substantive disclosure in the record.

Written from the 62 story beats below (2005 to 15 Mar 2016), which come from the company's own announcements and filings.

Beat by beat

The events that changed the company's story, in plain English, each written against everything known about the company at the time. The dot shows whether it was good, bad or neutral for shareholders.

shares on issue market cap (log scale)

20161k shares

  1. 15 Mar

    The waiver was extended to 15 April and widened to cover missed interest on the parent's 6.875% 2024 and 11% 2020 notes as well as EPL's own - by now the whole Energy XXI group was skipping bond payments. This is the last substantive disclosure in EPL's record.

    debt default or forbearance

    1k sh
  2. 4 Mar

    EPL missed the 15 February interest payment on its 8.25% 2018 notes. Its bank lenders waived the resulting default only until 14 March, barred any new borrowing and required loan proceeds to sit in accounts they controlled. The company was in default on its bonds and being kept alive two weeks at a time.

    debt default or forbearance

    1k sh

20151k shares

  1. 9 Sept

    EPL said its accounts from June 2014 through March 2015 could no longer be relied on: its hedging paperwork did not meet the documentation standard for hedge accounting, so derivative gains and losses parked in reserves should have run through profit all along. An accounting failure, not a cash one, but it cost the company credibility at the worst possible moment.

    financial restatement

    1k sh
  2. 18 Mar

    EPL signed a $325 million second-lien promissory note to its parent at 10% interest, funded by the parent's $1.45 billion issue of 11% secured notes, and used it to repay its share of the group revolver. The group was refinancing bank debt with far more expensive secured debt - the classic last stage before a restructuring.

    debt financing

    1k sh

20141k shares

  1. 3 Sept

    Immediately after the merger EPL bought South Pass 49 interests from a sister Energy XXI company for about $230 million, repaid and cancelled its own $475 million credit facility and joined the parent's first-lien loan. The same filing disclosed that the group had breached its leverage covenant at 30 June - 3.6 times against a 3.5 limit - and needed a lender waiver. The first crack in the acquirer.

    asset acquisition disposition

    1k sh
  2. 18 July

    EPL OIL & GAS, INC. terminated the registration of a class of securities, ending its reporting obligation for them.

    listing compliance notice

    1k shUS$38k
  3. 15 July

    EPL OIL & GAS, INC.'s exchange filed to remove a class of its securities from listing.

    listing compliance notice

    1k shUS$38k
  4. 3 June

    The merger with Energy XXI completed on 3 June 2014, making EPL an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary. Holders received about 65% cash and 35% Energy XXI shares, EPL's NYSE trading was suspended, and its directors and officers resigned.

    business combination

    39.2m shUS$1.48bn
  5. 21 Apr

    EPL and Energy XXI (Bermuda) Limited filed the definitive joint proxy statement for their March 12, 2014 merger agreement, in which EPL becomes an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of EXXI. EPL holders can elect $39.00 cash, 1.669 EXXI shares, or 0.584 shares plus $25.35 cash, prorated to about 65% cash and 35% stock, and the terms are fixed with no adjustment for share price moves. Former EPL holders would own about 25% of EXXI. EPL holders vote to adopt the merger, which needs a majority of EPL shares; EXXI holders meet May 30, 2014. EPL's directors and officers (about 0.9% of shares) have agreed to vote for it. This moves the sale agreed in March toward shareholder votes; the filing does not say the deal has closed.

    business combination

    39.2m shUS$1.51bn
  6. 13 Mar

    EPL agreed to be bought by Energy XXI: shareholders could elect $39.00 cash, 1.669 Energy XXI shares, or a mix, prorated so the total was 65% cash and 35% shares. The board also adopted a bylaw forcing shareholder lawsuits into Delaware. Five years after leaving bankruptcy with 5% of its own equity, the surviving stock was being cashed out at $39.

    business combination

    39.1m shUS$1.18bn
  7. 21 Jan

    The Nexen purchase closed on schedule at $70.4 million, adding the Eugene Island 258/259 leases to EPL's oil-weighted shelf position.

    asset acquisition disposition

    39.1m shUS$1.11bn
  8. 6 Jan

    EPL agreed to buy Nexen's Eugene Island 258/259 field for $70.4 million - five leases at full working interest producing about 900 barrels a day, 95% oil, with about $27 million of well-abandonment liability coming with them.

    material agreement

    39.1m shUS$1.11bn

201239.1m shares · US$846m market cap

  1. 6 Nov

    EPL completed the $550 million Hilcorp acquisition, funded by the new notes and bank borrowings, and at the same time expanded its secured facility from $250 million to a maximum of $750 million with maturity out to 2016. The company was now roughly three times the size it left bankruptcy at - and carried the debt to match.

    asset acquisition disposition

    39.1m shUS$846m
  2. 24 Oct

    EPL agreed to sell a further $300 million of 8.25% senior notes due 2018, netting about $288 million, to fund the Hilcorp acquisition.

    material agreement

    39.1m shUS$793m
  3. 18 Sept

    Now renamed EPL Oil & Gas, the company agreed to buy Hilcorp's Gulf of Mexico shelf subsidiary for $550 million - about 10,000 barrels a day and 36.3 million barrels of proved reserves, mostly ex-Chevron fields next to its own. By far its largest deal since the failed Stone bid, and more than twice the Anglo-Suisse purchase.

    material agreement

    39.1m shUS$673m
  4. 21 May

    Energy Partners bought W&T Offshore's 40% of the South Timbalier 41 field for $32.4 million, becoming sole owner of a field it already operated and adding about 960 barrels a day.

    asset acquisition disposition

    39.2m shUS$639m

201139.6m shares · US$569m market cap

  1. 21 Nov

    The Main Pass purchase closed at $38.4 million rather than $80 million, because an Apache subsidiary that already held a working interest exercised pre-emption rights over part of the package. The company got about half the assets it had agreed to buy.

    asset acquisition disposition

    39.6m shUS$569m
  2. 2 Nov

    Energy Partners agreed to pay $80 million for extra interests in the Main Pass complex it had bought into nine months earlier - from Stone Energy Offshore, a subsidiary of the same Stone Energy it had spent $52 million failing to acquire in 2006.

    material agreement

    39.6m shUS$569m
  3. 15 Feb

    The $210 million of 8.25% notes were issued and the Anglo-Suisse acquisition closed the same day for $200.7 million, the bond proceeds funding the purchase almost exactly. The rebuilt company now had a bond maturity in 2018 and a materially larger oil-weighted asset base.

    asset acquisition disposition

    40.1m shUS$645m
  4. 9 Feb

    To pay for the Anglo-Suisse assets the company agreed to sell $210 million of 8.25% senior notes due 2018, raising about $202 million - re-entering the unsecured bond market less than eighteen months after its previous notes were wiped out in bankruptcy, and at a far lower coupon than the 20% it paid on exit.

    material agreement

    40.1m shUS$645m
  5. 18 Jan

    Energy Partners agreed to buy shallow-water Gulf of Mexico producing assets from Anglo-Suisse Offshore Partners for $201.5 million cash - about 3,000 barrels a day, 92% oil, and roughly 8 million barrels of proved reserves next to its existing South Timbalier and East Bay fields. Its first real expansion since the bankruptcy.

    material agreement

    40.1m shUS$596m

2010

  1. 1 July

    Energy Partners redeemed the whole $61.1 million of 20% pay-in-kind notes held by Carlson Capital, Wexford and other exit lenders less than a year after issuing them, and at the same time replaced KPMG with PricewaterhouseCoopers as auditor. The most expensive piece of the bankruptcy financing was gone.

    auditor change

  2. 17 June

    The GE Capital exit facility was reset with a $70 million borrowing base and a fresh $25 million term loan, conditional on redeeming the 20% pay-in-kind notes issued at emergence - the first step in getting out from under the punitive rate the company had accepted nine months earlier.

    director officer appointment

2009

  1. 6 Oct

    Gary Hanna took over as chief executive on the day the company left bankruptcy, on a three-year contract paying at least $400,000 plus a bonus paid in shares, replacing Richard Bachmann, chairman and chief executive throughout the company's independent life up to that point.

    director officer appointment

  2. 25 Sept

    Energy Partners emerged from Chapter 11 on 21 September 2009, issuing 38 million new shares to noteholders and 2 million to existing shareholders. The old 8.75%, 9.75% and floating-rate notes and every existing equity plan were cancelled; new money came from a GE Capital exit facility and $61.1 million of 20% pay-in-kind second-lien notes taken by Carlson Capital, Wexford and others. The company survived intact; its shareholders kept a twentieth of it.

    bankruptcy or receivership

  3. 22 Sept

    the New York Stock Exchange certified EPL OIL & GAS, INC.'s securities for listing, clearing them to begin trading.

    listing compliance notice

  4. 4 Aug

    The court confirmed the reorganisation plan on 3 August 2009: noteholders take 95% of the new equity in exchange for their claims and existing shareholders are left with 5%, with management options able to take up to a further 3%. Emergence still depended on lining up an exit facility.

    bankruptcy or receivership

  5. 5 May

    Energy Partners and its US subsidiaries filed for Chapter 11 in Houston on 1 May 2009, having failed to repay the borrowing-base shortfall. It went in with a plan support agreement already signed by its noteholders and a settlement term sheet with the offshore regulator, so the outcome was largely pre-negotiated.

    bankruptcy or receivership

  6. 15 Apr

    EPL OIL & GAS, INC.'s exchange filed to remove a class of its securities from listing.

    listing compliance notice

  7. 14 Apr

    The banks extended the $38 million deadline again to 1 May and agreed not to act on the defaults already in place or expected - late audited accounts, broken financial ratios, and the cross-default from a missed interest payment on the notes. A holding pattern, not a fix.

    debt default or forbearance

  8. 6 Apr

    A cut to its borrowing base left Energy Partners owing its banks a $38 million shortfall it plainly could not pay; the lenders granted a short extension to 14 April while a forbearance was negotiated, and the company stated openly it might have to file for bankruptcy protection.

    debt default or forbearance

  9. 6 Mar

    The offshore regulator issued a non-compliance notice after Energy Partners failed to post $16.7 million of supplemental bonds securing its well plugging and platform removal obligations, and threatened to shut in its South Pass 27 and 28 facilities within three weeks. The first public sign the company could no longer meet its cash calls.

    debt default or forbearance

2008

  1. 2 Apr

    Energy Partners appointed three directors recommended by Carlson Capital, which owned about 9.4% of its shares: James Latimer, Bryant Patton and Steven Pully. Carlson agreed to vote for the company's 11-member slate at the 2008 annual meeting.

    director officer appointment

2007

  1. 18 June

    The Castex sale closed for about $72 million, used to pay down the revolver. The reserves sold were only about a third of the divestment package the company had been marketing; it was still shopping the rest of its non-core offshore assets with no assurance of price.

    material agreement

  2. 5 June

    Energy Partners agreed to sell substantially all its onshore south Louisiana assets to Castex Energy 2007 for $71.7 million cash - selling back to the Castex group the kind of onshore position it had bought from them for $146 million in early 2005 - and separately approved new long-term incentive awards for management.

    director officer appointment

  3. 30 Apr

    Energy Partners drew $70 million on its new facility to pay for the shares bought back in its self-tender, completing the leveraged buyback and leaving the company smaller in equity and much larger in debt.

    debt financing

  4. 26 Apr

    The recapitalisation closed: $300 million of 9.75% senior notes due 2014 and $150 million of floating-rate notes were issued, alongside a new Bank of America secured credit agreement. This roughly $450 million of unsecured debt is what the company could not carry two years later.

    debt financing

  5. 14 Mar

    Bank of America committed to finance a recapitalisation: a $300 million secured revolver plus at least $450 million of new notes or bridge loans, to buy back up to $200 million of shares and refinance both the bank facility and the 8.75% 2010 notes. Having failed to buy Stone, the company chose to lever up and shrink its own equity instead.

    material agreement

  6. 12 Mar

    On March 12, 2007 EPL filed a pre-commencement notice that it intends to launch an equity tender offer and a debt tender offer, announced in two press releases filed on a Form 8-K of the same date. The filing gives no price, size or terms, so nothing more can be stated. The issuer tender box is checked, i.e. these are EPL's own offers to buy back securities, which fits the 2007 recapitalisation in the context. This follows the failed Woodside bid and the sale process begun in October 2006, and no buyer was named in this record.

    business combination

2006

  1. 20 Nov

    ATS (Woodside) filed its final amendment reporting that its $23.00 tender offer expired at 11:59 p.m. on November 17, 2006 without ATS accepting any shares, because certain offer conditions were not satisfied and ATS did not waive them. ATS has instructed the depositary to return all tendered shares, so the hostile bid ends without a purchase. ATS also filed a November 19 press release and a November 20 Australian exchange announcement, whose contents are not shown. The consent solicitation to replace the board is not addressed in this filing.

    business combination

  2. 8 Nov

    EPL said it offered to share confidential information if ATS extended its tender offer and suspended its consent solicitation until about January 15, 2007. ATS refused to extend past November 17 or suspend the solicitation, so the board withheld information, kept pursuing alternatives and again urged rejection of the $23 offer.

    business combination

  3. 2 Nov

    ATS reported that it filed its definitive consent statement on October 30, 2006, and that EPL filed a definitive consent revocation statement on November 1 opposing it. ATS replied on November 2 that it would sign a confidentiality agreement to see EPL's information, provided the terms do not force it to end the offer or restrict its disclosures to shareholders, and repeated it will not extend beyond November 17. The $23.00 price is unchanged. This continues the standoff: both sides are fighting the consent vote while ATS says it may engage in the sale process.

    business combination

  4. 1 Nov

    EPL's board reported that ATS dismissed its Delaware claims on October 26, 2006, and, as EPL describes it, ATS abandoned any increase to $23.50 or $24.00 and said it would not extend beyond November 17. On November 1 EPL sent ATS a letter and company information, the same material it is giving other interested parties, to try to draw ATS into the sale process. The letter says shareholders have already rejected the offer three times and says the attached presentation describes a 76% exploratory success rate in 2006 to date. This continues the contest, with EPL inviting Woodside into the sale process rather than accepting its $23.00.

    business combination

  5. 27 Oct

    On October 26, 2006 EPL said several parties had signed or agreed to sign confidentiality agreements in its process of exploring options, including a possible sale. It also raised director and officer insurance cover to $50 million from $25 million, with a six-year run-off, for a premium of about $2.2 million.

    business combination

  6. 26 Oct

    ATS (Woodside) dropped its Delaware lawsuit over the Stone termination fees on October 26, 2006, saying the court had refused expedited hearings. The price stays at $23.00 but the possible $0.50 increases tied to that litigation are gone, and the offer now runs to 11:59pm on November 17, 2006. This ends the fee litigation thread (dismissed without prejudice) and removes the prospect of a higher price from that source.

    business combination

  7. 18 Oct

    ATS filed Amendment No. 7 on October 18, 2006, price unchanged at $23.00. It notes the Stone termination satisfied ATS's Stone condition, and EPL's disclosure that $44.5 million of capitalized Stone merger costs ($28.5 million after tax) will be expensed in the third quarter, plus the $8 million payment in the fourth. ATS also filed a second amended complaint (October 16) calling the termination fee provisions unlawful and claiming the $51.5 million EPL paid Stone (and Plains on Stone's behalf) should be returned; these are ATS's claims, not court findings. ATS also describes the October 6 and 9 letter exchange with EPL.

    business combination

  8. 13 Oct

    Energy Partners and Stone Energy tore up their merger agreement and released each other from all claims, with Energy Partners paying Stone $8 million to walk away and writing off $44.5 million of deal costs - including the $43.5 million it had already paid Plains Exploration to break Stone's earlier merger. Roughly $52 million was spent for nothing.

    business combination

  9. 13 Oct

    EPL ended the Stone Energy merger. On October 11, 2006 the board approved terminating the agreement, and EPL paid Stone $8 million, which the filing says is $17.6 million less than the fee that could have been payable. The board also directed a search for strategic alternatives, including a possible sale of the company, and hired UBS ($2 million fee) and expanded Petrie Parkman's role ($1 million fee) alongside Evercore and Bank of America Securities. This resolves the Stone deal thread and opens a sale process, though the filing does not say whether any sale will result.

    business combination

  10. 28 Sept

    ATS reported on September 28, 2006 that the Delaware court ruled orally on September 27 that Section 6.2(e) of the Stone merger agreement does not stop EPL from exploring unsolicited proposals such as ATS's offer, or from sharing information with bidders. This is ATS's description; a written decision was expected the week of October 2. This goes against the reading Stone had pressed and clears a path for EPL to engage with Woodside. ATS also extended its offer to October 20, 2006, reported only 23,564 shares tendered as of September 26, and said the antitrust waiting period expired September 27, satisfying that condition. The price is unchanged at $23.00.

    business combination

  11. 28 Sept

    EPL's board filed an amendment to its response to the ATS offer reporting the Delaware court's oral ruling of September 27, 2006. The court heard the case on September 22 and, per the transcript, was ruling on the meaning and validity of Section 6.2(e) of the Stone merger agreement. EPL says it has started discussions with Stone but is not disclosing their terms. It also mailed shareholders a summary of the rights plan with a letter from Richard Bachmann. The board's recommendation on the offer is not in the visible text, and the court's holding is only in the truncated part of the transcript, but ATS's filing of the same day describes it (see next entry).

    business combination

  12. 22 Sept

    the New York Stock Exchange certified EPL OIL & GAS, INC.'s securities for listing, clearing them to begin trading.

    listing compliance notice

  13. 18 Sept

    The board adopted a rights plan that penalises anyone acquiring 10% or more of EPL's stock without board approval. The Stone merger was excepted, and the board deferred the rights becoming exercisable for ATS's pending tender offer until ATS or another party became an Acquiring Person.

    security holder rights change

  14. 14 Sept

    EPL filed its formal response to the ATS offer on September 14, 2006. The visible text covers executive pay and change-of-control terms; the board's recommendation to shareholders is in the truncated part and not shown here. On September 13 the board amended its severance arrangements. The text says a qualifying termination on October 15, 2006 would cost about $7.3 million for four executives with severance agreements (Bachmann, Gobe, Peper, Woodall), $1.3 million for two others and $4.1 million for 11 key employees. Unvested options and share units would also vest if the ATS offer closed. Directors and officers hold 1,916,025 shares (about $44.1 million at $23.00) and, to the company's knowledge, none intends to tender. Timothy Woodall joined as an executive in 2006 on a $250,000 salary.

    business combination

  15. 7 Sept

    On September 7, 2006 EPL sued Stone in Delaware Chancery Court for a declaration that Section 6.2(e) of their merger agreement does not stop EPL's board from talking with, or soliciting, other bidders, including Woodside's ATS. Stone had said it disagreed with EPL's reading.

    business combination

  16. 31 Aug

    Woodside's ATS Inc. formally launched its hostile tender offer on August 31, 2006, offering $23.00 cash per share for all Energy Partners shares, rising to $23.50 or $24.00 depending on how the Delaware litigation over the termination fees is resolved. This turns the announced intention of August 28 into an actual offer that competes with the Stone Energy merger. The filing says Woodside and its subsidiaries already own 1,719,000 EPL shares and values the offer at about $985 million on 42,830,157 shares; the offer terms themselves sit in the Offer to Purchase, which is not shown in the text.

    business combination

  17. 28 Aug

    ATS filed a Delaware Chancery Court lawsuit on August 28, 2006 against EPL, Stone and EPL's directors (Bachmann, Gobe and others). It calls the Stone deal's termination fees invalid penalties: $43.5 million already paid to Plains for Stone and a $25.6 million fee. It also challenges an EPL bylaw requiring a supermajority for shareholder written consents. ATS says it plans a $23.00 per share cash tender offer, a 25% premium to the August 25 close, rising to $24.00 if both fees are struck down, conditioned on ending the Stone agreement. These are ATS's allegations, not findings.

    business combination

  18. 28 Aug

    On August 28, 2006, ATS Inc., an indirect subsidiary of Woodside Petroleum, filed a pre-launch notice of a planned tender offer for EPL shares, attaching a press release and an open letter to EPL employees. The form itself gives no price, and the contents of the exhibits are not shown in the text. This is the opening of the hostile bid that challenges the Stone merger.

    business combination

  19. 21 July

    The company registered up to 35,024,151 new shares to buy Stone Energy under a June 22, 2006 merger agreement. Each Stone share would get $51.00 in cash or EPL shares, with total cash capped at about $723 million and shares at about 35 million, so Stone holders would own up to about 46% of the combined company and existing EPL holders at least about 54%. EPL holders must vote to approve the share issue, and the filing puts total consideration at about $2.1 billion including about $800 million of Stone debt to be refinanced.

    business combination

  20. 23 June

    Energy Partners signed a merger agreement to buy Stone Energy at $51.00 a share in cash or shares, with the cash portion capped at about $723 million and the share exchange collared between 2.066 and 2.525 of its own shares - a transformational deal that would roughly double the company.

    business combination

  21. 19 June

    Stone Energy's board judged Energy Partners' cash-and-shares offer superior to Stone's existing agreed merger with Plains Exploration & Production, putting the much smaller Energy Partners in front to buy it.

    business combination

  22. 13 June

    On June 2, 2006, Energy Partners amended its credit facility, raising it from $200 million to $300 million with a $225 million initial borrowing base. Maturity moved from August 2008 to May 2011, and the facility could expand to $400 million, with the agreement referring to its offer for Stone Energy.

    material agreement

2005

  1. 26 Jan

    Energy Partners closed its first large acquisition, paying about $146 million cash for south Louisiana oil and gas properties from the Castex group, funded in part by drawing $60 million on its bank revolver - the start of a habit of buying producing assets with borrowed money.

    asset acquisition disposition